Appointments by prior arrangement are available if necessary. We apply our substantial experience obtained from being in practice since 1905 to ensure your legal needs are taken care of as quickly and efficiently as possible. Whether you are local to us in Redhill, Reigate, Leatherhead, Crawley, Gatwick, Balcombe, Haywards Heath, Burgess Hill or further afield, as long as you are in England or Wales we can help you.Choosing the right solicitor for your legal needs can be the difference between success and failure, moving or not moving, being successful in a claim for compensation or not.
Services
Efua completed a Bachelor of Laws (LLB) with the University of South Africa in 2008 and in 2012, was admitted to practice as an Advocate of the High Courts of Lesotho, her country of origin. While completing her studies, she also worked in family business which included Property Development and Renewable Energy Solutions until 2014 when she moved to the UK.
The last thing anyone usually thinks about when a family member or friend passes away is having to challenge their Will. Unfortunately for many reasons this is perhaps a more common occurrence than people think. The reasons for challenging the validity of a Will or for contesting probate are many and varied.
We can provide you with solutions for the types of dispute listed below. Only when you are aware of all the available options can you make an informed decision. We will outline all your choices and their consequences both with regard to outcome and cost. If you instruct us we will try to resolve your dispute in the manner which is the most appropriate and cost effective for you. We will provide details of our experience and charges for each option. It is your decision on how you would like to proceed.
Driving for most people is a part of everyday life. It is hard to imagine being without your driving licence and losing the freedom that comes with it. For some people, being disqualified could mean losing their job or make running their own business incredibly difficult. Gray Hooper Holt's specialist driving offences team will argue your case for you to ensure that you keep your driving licence whenever possible or, if you lose it, it is for the shortest possible time.We are aware that, for many of our clients, motoring offences can cause acute embarrassment on both a personal and business level.
Reviews (2)
G.
Mar 19, 2018
Im not sure about the above review but we used Gray Hooper Holt for our conveyancing and will service. We had a great service from them at a very reasonable price. I did bring up the review with them and they were aware of it being misleading. Any way great service and thanks for helping us buy our first house
Sean Lewis
Sep 26, 2017
(I would have given NO STARS, but had to give a star for the option to post review) If you are thinking of using this firm to represent you, then I would not think twice. WALK AWAY & FAST. Of all the companies that I have been involved with in my life, I can categorically state from the highest steeple that this firm comes top of one of the worse practises that I was unfortunate to stumble across.
Sometimes you go to solicitors when you need legal litigation or in a desperate situation. In my case it was the latter. This firm saw my desperation, seized their scrupulous opportunity, abused & betrayed my trust. I had an ongoing court case which I needed legal help. I by mischance saw this firm as I was going to the Post Office. They were directly opposite the PO.
I gave them details to my case. They examined them and agreed to take the case on but of course not without upfront payment. A Mr Arthur Li was a signed to my case. I paid them up front for initially examining my case. My instructions to Gray Hooper Holt LLP (GHH) which were in part from the court was clear & simple. To get me an appointment to obtain a medical report from a clinical psychiatrist & an extension of the court hearing. GHH had 3 months from when I came to them to complete the process of obtaining an appointment before the court hearing. GHH wanted further payment. GHH wanted full money before booking an appointment with the clinical psychiatrist & completing forms for an extension.
Most importantly GHH knew of the time constraints of the case but chose to neglect that fact. I paid the firm in full. The firm did not do what I had instructed them. They did not get me an appointment with the clinical psychiatrist or obtain an extension. Infact GHH did nothing to help me or my case. All they did was help themselves to my hard earned money. GHH failed to keep me in formed of the progress of the case.
The court hearing was a telephone hearing. A telephone hearing maybe convenient but I was not consulted if I wanted one. As Mr Li had failed to get a medical report this in turn failed the judge's decision to grant an extension. My case was struck out. The only statement of excuse that I got from GHH via Mr Li was that I took too long before I approached them.
If they were in my shoes they would have never started a claim in the first place. Mr Li's work is finished now. All the money I had paid is used up, & by the kindest of his heart he had done the telephone hearing for nothing. IT WAS ALL MY ENTIRE FAULT. When I became more suspicious of GHH actions and operations GHH became extremely defensive. GHH never gave me a scope (quotation) of the work they would be doing, or even terms & conditions.
I complained to a Mr Robert Gray, but this just fell on deaf ears. GHH never acknowledged to what they had done and most importantly of all no consideration to my feelings. I took my complaint about GHH to the Legal Ombudsman. In January 2017 the Legal Ombudsman found in my favour. Not only did GHH have to pay me compensation but they had to pay costs to the Legal Ombudsman.
To this day it baffles me on their ludicrous why operating a so called legitimate professional business. This firm chose to cut their nose to spite their face. A rather poor display for the reputation of Solicitors. In dealing with GHH, even to talking with the Redhill branches secretary they were uncannily rude. I was unlucky to come into contact not only with this firm and the people involved in there.
I cannot really speak for the quality of the other solicitors or employees from the other branches but I am a believer of the old saying. "The rotten apple does not fall far from its tree". If you value your sanity and want the best chance of winning your case then steer well clear of all branches associated with Gray Hooper Holt LLP in my realistic opinion. Especially Redhill.
Sometimes you go to solicitors when you need legal litigation or in a desperate situation. In my case it was the latter. This firm saw my desperation, seized their scrupulous opportunity, abused & betrayed my trust. I had an ongoing court case which I needed legal help. I by mischance saw this firm as I was going to the Post Office. They were directly opposite the PO.
I gave them details to my case. They examined them and agreed to take the case on but of course not without upfront payment. A Mr Arthur Li was a signed to my case. I paid them up front for initially examining my case. My instructions to Gray Hooper Holt LLP (GHH) which were in part from the court was clear & simple. To get me an appointment to obtain a medical report from a clinical psychiatrist & an extension of the court hearing. GHH had 3 months from when I came to them to complete the process of obtaining an appointment before the court hearing. GHH wanted further payment. GHH wanted full money before booking an appointment with the clinical psychiatrist & completing forms for an extension.
Most importantly GHH knew of the time constraints of the case but chose to neglect that fact. I paid the firm in full. The firm did not do what I had instructed them. They did not get me an appointment with the clinical psychiatrist or obtain an extension. Infact GHH did nothing to help me or my case. All they did was help themselves to my hard earned money. GHH failed to keep me in formed of the progress of the case.
The court hearing was a telephone hearing. A telephone hearing maybe convenient but I was not consulted if I wanted one. As Mr Li had failed to get a medical report this in turn failed the judge's decision to grant an extension. My case was struck out. The only statement of excuse that I got from GHH via Mr Li was that I took too long before I approached them.
If they were in my shoes they would have never started a claim in the first place. Mr Li's work is finished now. All the money I had paid is used up, & by the kindest of his heart he had done the telephone hearing for nothing. IT WAS ALL MY ENTIRE FAULT. When I became more suspicious of GHH actions and operations GHH became extremely defensive. GHH never gave me a scope (quotation) of the work they would be doing, or even terms & conditions.
I complained to a Mr Robert Gray, but this just fell on deaf ears. GHH never acknowledged to what they had done and most importantly of all no consideration to my feelings. I took my complaint about GHH to the Legal Ombudsman. In January 2017 the Legal Ombudsman found in my favour. Not only did GHH have to pay me compensation but they had to pay costs to the Legal Ombudsman.
To this day it baffles me on their ludicrous why operating a so called legitimate professional business. This firm chose to cut their nose to spite their face. A rather poor display for the reputation of Solicitors. In dealing with GHH, even to talking with the Redhill branches secretary they were uncannily rude. I was unlucky to come into contact not only with this firm and the people involved in there.
I cannot really speak for the quality of the other solicitors or employees from the other branches but I am a believer of the old saying. "The rotten apple does not fall far from its tree". If you value your sanity and want the best chance of winning your case then steer well clear of all branches associated with Gray Hooper Holt LLP in my realistic opinion. Especially Redhill.
